[plt-scheme] Re: Is R6RS useless for PLT?

From: Matthias Felleisen (matthias at ccs.neu.edu)
Date: Mon Nov 24 11:41:49 EST 2008

On Nov 24, 2008, at 11:09 AM, Tom Gordon wrote:

> PLT's support for R6RS seems somewhat half-hearted and ambiguous.

Tom, I reject this as unfair. Compare our implementation to those of  
others, and we are ahead still. Matthew provides test suits for R6RS  
and friends, which others borrow to develop their own R6RS  
implementations. Why should we do more than those people? But perhaps  
you're really requesting that PLT stay away from RnRS efforts. --  

Posted on the users mailing list.