| From: Matthias Felleisen (matthias at ccs.neu.edu) Date: Mon Nov 24 11:41:49 EST 2008 |
|
On Nov 24, 2008, at 11:09 AM, Tom Gordon wrote: > PLT's support for R6RS seems somewhat half-hearted and ambiguous. Tom, I reject this as unfair. Compare our implementation to those of others, and we are ahead still. Matthew provides test suits for R6RS and friends, which others borrow to develop their own R6RS implementations. Why should we do more than those people? But perhaps you're really requesting that PLT stay away from RnRS efforts. -- Matthias
| Posted on the users mailing list. |
|
![[logo]](/logo.png){kind=logo}