From: Henk Boom (lunarc.lists at gmail.com) Date: Thu Nov 20 22:33:10 EST 2008 |
|
2008/11/20 Matthew Flatt <mflatt at cs.utah.edu>: > That's correct for mutable hash tables. Immutable hash tables (with > functional updated) are implemented using a red--black tree. Does this mean that if I am not planning to modify a hash table after construction, that it is preferable to use mutable hash tables for lookup speed? I've been using immutable ones simply because they have a ready-made constructor from alists. Henk
Posted on the users mailing list. |
|