[plt-scheme] Re: Is R6RS useless for PLT?

The only problem is that I'm forced to choose between power and portability.

--
Bohdan

Matthias Felleisen wrote:
> 
> 
> As the naming conventions in DrScheme suggest, we consider
> our Module language the primary development vehicle. R6RS,
> like R5RS, is supported and available. Bug reports and
> feature requests are taken seriously. As Robby indicates,
> R6RS is our bridge to other Scheme implementations and we
> would like libraries to flow into our world. -- Matthias
>