[plt-scheme] 3.99.0.20-svn25mar2008 [3m]: spurious debugging output?

From: Matthias Felleisen (matthias at ccs.neu.edu)
Date: Thu Mar 27 07:28:43 EDT 2008

I was working with .20 but I built from scratch and I am on Mac  
Intel. Weird.



On Mar 27, 2008, at 1:22 AM, Andrew Reilly wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 08:10:42AM -0400, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>>
>>
>> I couldn't reproduce this with a drscheme downloaded early afternoon
>> (eastern). Could you describe what you did after you started  
>> drscheme?
>
> Hmm.  Open Recent files... Pick top-level program file.  Press
> Run button.
>
> Weirdness doesn't happen for 3.99.0.12, but does for .20.
>
> Trying it again, now, I find that the Check Syntax button
> produces the same debug output, but does so in a console window,
> after the following warning:
> WARNING: open-input-file: cannot open input file: "/Users/andrew/ 
> Library/PLT Scheme/3.99.0.20/doc/typed-scheme/out.sxref" (No such  
> file or directory; errno=2)
> That's probably something different...
>
> I'll see if I can whittle down a minimal example that
> demonstrates the problem....
>
> OK, this seems to demonstrate the same sort of output (for both
> Check Syntax and Run), without extraneous dependencies:
>
> #lang scheme
>
> (define (data-set d)
>   (map
>    (match-lambda
>      ((list 'param (list-no-order (list 'row row) (list 'col col)  
> (list 'value value) _ ...))
>       (list row col value))
>      ((list 'path (list-no-order (list 'relative rel) _ ...) path)
>       (list rel path))
>      ((list 'string (list-no-order (list 'id id) _ ...) s)
>       (list id s)))
>    d))
>
> That example runs with no output (since nothing is actually
> being called, just defined) in 3.99.0.12, but produces some
> list output in 3.99.0.20.
>
> Before getting this far, I was worried about some of the
> libraries that I was require'ing.  My main worry is xml/main.ss,
> since that doesn't seem to be documented in the 3.99 series.  I
> hope it doesn't go away: it's very useful.  Doesn't seem to be a
> problem in this instance, though.
>
> Cheers,
>
> -- 
> Andrew



Posted on the users mailing list.