[plt-scheme] Re: yield-oriented sequence constructor

On Mar 22, Doug Orleans wrote:
> 
> The thing that seems like voodoo to me in my version is that there's
> no mutation involved: [...]

But there is state -- in the for loop (whether one that gets mutated
or with a named let loop)...

-- 
          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
                  http://www.barzilay.org/                 Maze is Life!