[plt-scheme] Possible bug in for/fold

From: Noel Welsh (noelwelsh at gmail.com)
Date: Fri Jun 27 16:14:31 EDT 2008

On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 6:33 PM, Carl Eastlund <cce at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
> The behavior of for/fold seems perfectly symmetric to me (for/fold
> expects exactly as many values as it has accumulators in all cases).

On reflection I think you're correct.  I suppose I had never run into
the difference between returning no values and returning void.


Posted on the users mailing list.