| From: Noel Welsh (noelwelsh at gmail.com) Date: Fri Jun 27 16:14:31 EDT 2008 |
|
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 6:33 PM, Carl Eastlund <cce at ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > The behavior of for/fold seems perfectly symmetric to me (for/fold > expects exactly as many values as it has accumulators in all cases). On reflection I think you're correct. I suppose I had never run into the difference between returning no values and returning void. N.
| Posted on the users mailing list. |
|
![[logo]](/logo.png){kind=logo}