From: Tom Schouten (tom at zwizwa.be) Date: Wed Jun 4 13:44:22 EDT 2008 |
|
tOn Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 09:12:42AM -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote: > At Wed, 04 Jun 2008 17:02:15 +0200, Tom Schouten wrote: > > is there a way to make (prompt (e '(abort 123))) work as expected > > using a scheme/sandbox evaluator? the abort thunk seems to be passed > > as an exception.. bug or feature? > > Bug, but fixed a couple of weeks ago in SVN. thanks! sorry for not checking latest..
Posted on the users mailing list. |
|