Fw: [plt-scheme] Confusing continuation behavior (a question about)

From: Anton van Straaten (anton at appsolutions.com)
Date: Thu Jul 17 20:29:07 EDT 2008

Sorry, I didn't mean to be so blunt about it - I was too focused on the 
problem.

Anton


Jos Koot wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Oops. So sorry.
> Jos
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Anton van Straaten" 
>> <anton at appsolutions.com>
>> To: "Grant Rettke" <grettke at acm.org>
>> Cc: "PLT-list" <plt-scheme at list.cs.brown.edu>
>> Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 1:36 AM
>> Subject: Re: [plt-scheme] Confusing continuation behavior (a question 
>> about)
>>
>>
>>
>>> 2. Jos Koot's solution doesn't achieve the desired effect, since it 
>>> simply re-executes the whole of 'impl' every time.  impl is local 
>>> with respect to 'process', so the effect of the set! is lost once 
>>> control transfers out of the procedure.  This can be seen in the 
>>> output which repeats "Condition 1 is met, going to condition 2" three 
>>> times.)
>>>
>>> Anton
>>> _________________________________________________
>>>  For list-related administrative tasks:
>>>  http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme
>>
> 
> _________________________________________________
>  For list-related administrative tasks:
>  http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme


Posted on the users mailing list.