[plt-scheme] When is flat-named-contract necessary/useful?

From: Richard Cobbe (cobbe at ccs.neu.edu)
Date: Thu Jul 10 21:32:40 EDT 2008

On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 05:58:17PM -0500, Robby Findler wrote:
> When -> gets a predicate as an argument (as opposed to something that
> is already a contract, it calls flat-named-contract, supplying the
> name of the procedure if the procedure has a name.
> Does that answer the question?

Perfectly.  Thanks!


Posted on the users mailing list.