[plt-scheme] call-by-value vs. call-by-name?

Should such an opportunity as this go unmet?  Acronyms, like the macro,
_must_ be expanded, fulfilling their unbridled manifest destiny.  To do
less is an insult to all acronyms everywhere.  For the acronym, which 
stands for nothing, does not stand for anything at all. Where is the
outrage!?!

A steering committee must, simply must, be convened immediately.  They
shall in turn appoint editors, who shall not rest until  ...


On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 11:56 -0500, Shriram Krishnamurthi wrote:
> PLT does not stand for anything.
> 
> We're computer scientists: we don't need expansions for our abbreviations.
> 
> Shriram
> _________________________________________________
>   For list-related administrative tasks:
>   http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme