From: Filipe Cabecinhas (filcab at gmail.com) Date: Wed Feb 20 16:49:25 EST 2008 |
|
On 20 Feb, 2008, at 21:31, Robby Findler wrote: > It's clear! I guess the easiest thing would be to write a macro that > consumes the names of the methods and generates classes that respond > to those methods. Something like this: > > <snip> > Yes, I'm doing something like that. But I have tons of methods (I'm interfacing with a big program) and that solution doesn't scale well. But I'll just keep it and try to find better ways. Thanks anyway. F
Posted on the users mailing list. |
|