[plt-scheme] about letrec and continuation : which behavior is correct ? and why ?

On Aug 19, 2008, at 1:24 PM, Abdulaziz Ghuloum wrote:

> Scheme is not unique in this aspect (e.g., C++ can only be  
> syntactically verified
> by expanding the templates).

Interesting. I had never realized that C++ is in exactly the same  
boat as Scheme.
Or is Scheme in the same boat as C++ since the items I am referring  
to date back
to 1984-1986? In either case, it is nice to know that we're not alone  
and that we
can always point to C++ as a comparably defined language. -- Matthias