| From: Aleks Bromfield (aleks at cs.brown.edu) Date: Mon Apr 7 18:18:16 EDT 2008 |
|
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 10:51:40PM +0100, Dave Gurnell wrote: > "Table" seems like a very popular and loaded term. Is something like > "hash" a viable alternative that would reduce naming collisions? Why not "dict"? I normally use "dictionary" to refer to the ADT and "hash table" to refer to a specific implementation. ~ Aleks
| Posted on the users mailing list. |
|
![[logo]](/logo.png){kind=logo}