[plt-scheme] Clarification about control key behavior

That would be very nice, indeed. My thoughts would be to leave the
menu-keybindings mode on and try to find keys for all of the ones that
get masked by the menu keys being turned on.

Robby

On 9/12/07, Grant Rettke <grettke at acm.org> wrote:
> On 9/12/07, Robby Findler <robby at cs.uchicago.edu> wrote:
> > that is the current state of DrScheme keybindings. windows, the control key is just too
> > overloaded.
>
> I read about keybinding precedence in Kyles' article:
>
> http://schemekeys.blogspot.com/2007/05/keybinding-101-in-drscheme.html
>
> Based on what you said it sounds like there are simply a lot of
> keybindings that happen to have precedence over said desired
> keybindings?
>
> Do you think it would be worth the time to create a Windows-specific
> keybinding that had everything bound in an non-conflicting manner? I
> am interested in doing this but I'm not quite sure anyone else is
> particularly interested in something like this.
>
> Window split and collapse and navigation combined with rep and editor
> show/hide are real gems that make the IDE more pleasurable to use.
> _________________________________________________
>   For list-related administrative tasks:
>   http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme
>