[plt-scheme] append!?

On Oct 22, Robby Findler wrote:
> Or trampolines? But gcc has a tail-call optimization, I thought.

It has some limited support -- IIRC, only recursion, not even mutual
recursion, and definitely not arbitrary never-return calls.


> As far as closures go, I agree that it won't really be closures,
> which is why I wondered if that disqualified this way of writing
> it. But it seems reasonably close.

I have some dim memory of similar things -- they were far from what
you get in a functional language.

-- 
          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
                  http://www.barzilay.org/                 Maze is Life!