[plt-scheme] A macro for declaring class properties, a question

On 10/18/07, Noel Welsh <noelwelsh at gmail.com> wrote:

> You don't need to unhygenically introduce an identifier, as all
> accesses of the field should go through the accessor method, right?

Right. I was interested in an example of a situation where you do (for
some reason) care about that name that gets created, and the
implications of doing so.

Thanks Noel