[plt-scheme] Why do folks implement *dynamically* typed languages?

From: hendrik at topoi.pooq.com (hendrik at topoi.pooq.com)
Date: Wed May 30 20:26:34 EDT 2007

On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 10:21:42AM -0500, Grant Rettke wrote:
> Here is is another perspective:
> If you were to set about designing a programming language, what are
> the reasons for yourself or for your users that you would choose
> between implementing your language as a DL or a SL?

There's no reason to have to choose, if you design carefully.

-- hendrik

Posted on the users mailing list.