[plt-scheme] Re: On C#

On 5/22/07, Robert Nikander <nikander at nc.rr.com> wrote:
> Paulo J. Matos wrote:
> >
> > Then I suggested PLTScheme or if people are against it, Ocaml.
> >
> > After a lot of discussion Ocaml was scratched. C# and PLTScheme were
>
> Are you aware of F#?  It's basically OCaml for .NET, from Microsoft
> Research.  I used it recently and was impressed.  It has some support
> for Visual Studio 'intellisense', but it's not as polished as the C# stuff.
>

Yes, in fact, one of the M$ devs were here recently talking about it.
Unfortunately, nobody liked it much.

Anyway, my opinion is go with PLT Scheme. After the demo, we'll see if
I convince them! :-)

> Rob
>
>
>


-- 
Paulo Jorge Matos - pocm at soton.ac.uk
http://www.personal.soton.ac.uk/pocm
PhD Student @ ECS
University of Southampton, UK