[plt-scheme] Are new Schemers supposed to be reading SRFIs?

From: Chongkai Zhu (czhu at cs.utah.edu)
Date: Thu May 10 20:20:32 EDT 2007

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Robby Findler" <robby at cs.uchicago.edu>
To: "Robert Nikander" <nikander at nc.rr.com>
Cc: <plt-scheme at list.cs.brown.edu>
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 5:06 PM
Subject: Re: [plt-scheme] Are new Schemers supposed to be reading SRFIs?


> 
> I think one complaint is that it is hard to decide who gets the "good"
> names, like "format.ss".
> 

For current SRFIs in PLT Scheme, there is no name conflict at all.

For future SRFIs that may cause a name conflict, name+number is always a solution.

Chongkai

Posted on the users mailing list.