[plt-scheme] send/forward vs send/finish

Yes,

Thank you. So if I understand well, both cases are memory
preserving.

--Hans



Op 11/3/2007 schreef "Jay McCarthy" <jay.mccarthy at gmail.com>:

>Yes.
>
>send/finish means all interactions have ceased and all continuations
>are reclaimed.
>
>send/forward means all past interactions have ceased, so they are all
>reclaimed, then a new interaction is started. (So you can only go
>"forward".)
>
>Does that answer your question?
>
>Jay
>
>On 3/11/07, Hans Oesterholt-Dijkema <hdnews at gawab.com> wrote:
>> Dear All,
>>
>> Regarding the PLT Web Server:
>>
>> I'm wondering. send/finish reclaims the continuations used by the servlet.
>> send/forward clears the continuation table. Does this also mean
>> continuations
>> are reclaimed?
>>
>> Thanks in advance for your answer,
>>
>> Hans
>>
>> _________________________________________________
>>   For list-related administrative tasks:
>>   http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme
>>
>
>
>--
>Jay McCarthy <jay.mccarthy at gmail.com>
>http://jay.teammccarthy.org
>
>