| From: Robby Findler (robby at cs.uchicago.edu) Date: Fri Jun 15 10:09:28 EDT 2007 |
|
On 6/14/07, Grant Rettke <grettke at acm.org> wrote: > It seems I could replace this letrec with let and be guaranteed the > same behavior? Yes. (But not necc. in other Schemes). Robby
| Posted on the users mailing list. |
|
![[logo]](/logo.png){kind=logo}