[plt-scheme] keyword arguments (in v4.0, maybe)

On Jun 12, Dimitris Vyzovitis wrote:
> 
> All this sounds incredibly complicated and major code breakage
> inducing.  What's wrong with paying a price for keywords that need
> it dynamically?  Why not work on refining the kw lib to be more
> efficient (perhaps use a parameter) instead?

(I think that the issue is more a robust language than efficiency.)

-- 
          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
                  http://www.barzilay.org/                 Maze is Life!