[plt-scheme] . nitpick .

I wonder why there isn't a r5rs module.

On 6/10/07, Jos Koot <jos.koot at telefonica.net> wrote:
> One could set (read-accept-dot #f) as default for language R5RS.
> Adding (read-accept-dot #f) to .../collects/r5rs/lang.ss does the trick,
> although another location may be more appropriate.
> Jos koot
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Anton van Straaten" <anton at appsolutions.com>
> To: "PLT Scheme" <plt-scheme at list.cs.brown.edu>
> Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 4:15 PM
> Subject: [plt-scheme] . nitpick .
>
>
> > Shouldn't the R5RS language level disallow the infix dot syntax?
> >
> > As seen in this message:
> >
> > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.scheme/msg/40f19cb9863cf28d
> >
> > ...someone experimenting can get confused by the infix feature.  It would be
> > helpful to be able to respond to that by saying "that's an extension -- use
> > the R5RS language level if you want to experiment with standard Scheme
> > behavior".  But here, we can't say that.
> >
> > Anton
> >
> > _________________________________________________
> >  For list-related administrative tasks:
> >  http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme
> >
>
> _________________________________________________
>   For list-related administrative tasks:
>   http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme
>