From: Andrew Reilly (andrew-scheme at areilly.bpc-users.org) Date: Wed Jun 6 02:20:43 EDT 2007 |
|
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 02:32:42PM +0200, Jens Axel S??gaard wrote: > > [1 .. 11] > (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10) I think that the idea is neat (I particularly like the vector-ref short-hand), but in this mode of use I think that the interval should go to 11, in deference with the historic use of [a .. b]. What you've got above is more like [a .. b). (I'm pretty partial to (iota 10 1) for this particular idiom, myself, though.) Cheers, -- Andrew
Posted on the users mailing list. |
|