[plt-scheme] Why do folks implement *dynamically* typed languages?

On Jun 2, 2007, at 1:48 PM, Joe Marshall wrote:

> On 6/2/07, Richard Cleis <rcleis at mac.com> wrote:
>>
>> Are we 'ordered' into software prisons that have too much freedom?
>> Do we choose type systems to introduce a higher level of
>> civilization?  Are we trying to escape to other programming  
>> paradigms?
>
> Colonel Nicholson was insane.
> -- 
> ~jrm

... yet, the rest of us provably are not insane.  That's why subjects  
like these are non-controversial.

rac