From: Matthew Flatt (mflatt at cs.utah.edu) Date: Mon Jul 9 18:26:01 EDT 2007 |
|
At Mon, 09 Jul 2007 17:21:28 -0600, Chongkai Zhu wrote: > So here I would like to ask: what is the correct way to "define" > something that will apply before the match library see the pattern? Is `define-match-expander' what you're looking for? It allows you to extend the syntax of patterns (which are not expressions, and so macro bindings don't have any effect on them). Matthew
Posted on the users mailing list. |
|