| From: Matthew Flatt (mflatt at cs.utah.edu) Date: Mon Jul 9 18:26:01 EDT 2007 |
|
At Mon, 09 Jul 2007 17:21:28 -0600, Chongkai Zhu wrote: > So here I would like to ask: what is the correct way to "define" > something that will apply before the match library see the pattern? Is `define-match-expander' what you're looking for? It allows you to extend the syntax of patterns (which are not expressions, and so macro bindings don't have any effect on them). Matthew
| Posted on the users mailing list. |
|