| From: Mark Engelberg (mark.engelberg at gmail.com) Date: Sun Jul 8 22:24:26 EDT 2007 |
|
> I do think that they should actually have used 2-dimensional laziness > instead of falling back on quasi-imperative programming with monads. > But that's water under the bridge. What is 2-dimensional laziness, and how does that solve the problem? --Mark
| Posted on the users mailing list. |
|
![[logo]](/logo.png){kind=logo}