From: Shriram Krishnamurthi (sk at cs.brown.edu) Date: Thu Jul 5 10:32:05 EDT 2007 |
|
What you're trying to do is re-create a poor-man's system of "futures" (which originated in Common Lisp, and for a while were investigated by PLT for Scheme). You should look up futures and try a bit harder to properly reproduce their semantics. Right now I don't really see what advantage you're getting at all: you say that you want the body to evaluate only after the thread finishes, at which point...why not just use LET? Shriram
Posted on the users mailing list. |
|