[plt-scheme] Smallest set of operators

On 2/2/07, Paulo J. Matos <pocm at soton.ac.uk> wrote:
> On 2/2/07, Robby Findler <robby.findler at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Your question is easy to understand.
> >
> > Matthias has given you your answer. 1. He has also given you pointers
> > to understand that answer.
> >
> > Maybe its time to think of a new question or try to go understand the
> > answers you've been given?
> >
> > Maybe that will also help you understand why this question isn't very useful.
> >
> > Good luck. And please do bring any new questions :)
> >
>
> Risking you to block my messages to the list...
> I understood and appreciated Matthias answer, however, X doesn't
> belong to the Scheme Standard, so it is not really what I expected. I
> expected a set which belonged to Scheme [standard] but it seems there
> is not definite answer then!

X does belong. Go look up its definition. Its just a bunch of lambdas.

> Regards,
> Paulo Matos
>
> > Robby
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Paulo Jorge Matos - pocm at soton.ac.uk
> http://www.personal.soton.ac.uk/pocm
> PhD Student @ ECS
> University of Southampton, UK
>