[plt-scheme] Smallest set of operators

On Feb 2, 2007, at 6:08 AM, Robby Findler wrote:

>
> The point here is that the question you are asking needs to be asked
> carefully, or you may not get the answer you are asking for. What do
> you really want to do?

How about a minimal subset? There may be multiple minimal subsets,  
and they need not all have the same cardinality.

Gregory Woodhouse
gregory.woodhouse at sbcglobal.net

I hear and I forget.
I see and I remember.
I do and I understand.
--Attributed to Confucius, 500 BCE



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20070202/cc801145/attachment.html>