[plt-scheme] let vs parameterize?

No, parameterize doesn't use custodians. They're independent of each other.

Robby

On 4/16/07, Yin-So Chen <yinso.chen at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Robby/Carl (and Eric for answering privately) -
>
> here's a related question:  Does parameterize automatically uses a custodian
> (e.g. current-custodian) to manage resources or custodians have to be used
> explicitly?
>
>
> On 4/16/07, Robby Findler <robby at cs.uchicago.edu> wrote:
> > Another difference between parameters and fluid-let: in a fluid-let
> > the values are not thread local, but in a parameter they are.
> >
> > Robby
> >
> > On 4/16/07, Carl Eastlund <cce at ccs.neu.edu > wrote:
> > > On 4/16/07, Yin-So Chen <yinso.chen at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > What is the difference between using let vs parameterize?
> > >
> > > Let operates on bindings.  It creates a new name and binds it to a
> > > value.  This affects code directly within the let-body that refers to
> > > the same name, providing it is not bound again ("shadowed") inside the
> > > let.
> > >
> > > Parameterize operates on parameters, which are values.  It takes an
> > > existing parameter and makes it return a different value during the
> > > execution of the body of the parameterize.  This affects any code
> > > called during that execution, even if it's in a different function,
> > > module, whatever, so long as it uses the same parameter value.
> > >
> > > > It seems that one can use let to manipulate parameter objects (at
> least
> > > > scheme doesn't forbid it) - any issues with using it?
> > >
> > > Let does not manipulate values at all.  It just binds names to
> > > existing values.  It never changes values or their contents.
> > >
> > > >  How do I know whether or not something is a parameter versus a
> variable?
> > >
> > > You could ask the same thing about numbers vs variables, or strings vs
> > > variables.  A variable is a name for a value.  That value might be
> > > anything: number, string, list, parameter, etc.  But you should be
> > > careful never to confuse the name with what it refers to.
> > >
> > > And in response to the followup email: fluid-let, like let, operates
> > > on variables (names), not values.  Hence it would not be an
> > > "extension" to make it work on parameters.  If you give the name of a
> > > parameter to fluid-let, it will change which parameter that name
> > > refers to, not the contents of the current parameter.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Carl Eastlund
> > > _________________________________________________
> > >   For list-related administrative tasks:
> > >   http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.yinsochen.com
> ...continuous learning...