[plt-scheme] Another macro venture

At 11:41 AM 9/9/2006, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>On Sep  9, Blake McBride wrote:
> > [...]
> > Again, all this is trivial to express in a lisp-like macro system and the
> > few capture situations are easy to avoid with a little care.
>
>Note that even in CL:
>
>   (let ((a 1)) (set 'a 3) a) => 1
>
>in MzScheme terms, such a `set' would only change bindings in the
>current namespace, which makes it close to useless.

I understand.  However, creating the set I seek will give me an
easy example of evaluating one additional level higher from
my previous macro difficulty.

Thanks for the help.

Blake McBride
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20060909/d698f55c/attachment.html>