[plt-scheme] symbols redefined in SRFIs

> >>   (require (lib "list.ss" "1" "srfi"))
> >
> > [... at which point becomes clear to me that I'm again fighting a
> > losing battle against an entrenched poor deisgn...]
>
> I might be litle slow, but which language construct has a poor design?

I was referring to the conflicts built into srfi-1. Again, I'm
advocating just removing the non-SRFI-1 versions, or hiding them. Same
for SRFI-43.

I'm not debating conflicts in general, in case you were thinking of that...

-- Dan