[plt-scheme] a simple macro (fwd)

From: Danny Yoo (dyoo at hkn.eecs.berkeley.edu)
Date: Tue Nov 21 21:18:08 EST 2006

Hi Michael,

[Please use Reply-To-All since you probably want to ask this to the list. 
I'm still a newcomer to PLT Scheme and am likely to give non-optimal 

It's perfectly possible to write a function for use in both contexts, but 
from my best understanding, PLT's system requires you to put that function 
in a dedicated module in order to reuse it.

Once there, you can either say:

     (require "some-module.ss")


     (require-for-syntax "some-module.ss")

to pull that function definition for the specific phase context you want. 
Take a closer look at that Composable and Compilable Macros paper: it goes 
through a nice example that talks about this in some detail.

By the way, here's another set of slides that are aimed as introductory 
Scheme macro material:


---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 18:09:58 -0800 (PST)
From: michael rice <nowgate at yahoo.com>
To: Danny Yoo <dyoo at hkn.eecs.berkeley.edu>
Subject: Re: [plt-scheme] a simple macro

Do I have to have two function definitions, one
regular and one for syntax?


Welcome to DrScheme, version 360.
Language: Swindle.
> (fun 4)
. reference to undefined identifier: fun
> (mac 4)

Posted on the users mailing list.