[plt-scheme] Please help test version 359.100

At Tue, 14 Nov 2006 12:54:54 +0100, "Jos Koot" wrote:
> ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Robby Findler 
>   To: Matthias Felleisen 
>   Cc: Jacob Matthews ; plt-scheme at list.cs.brown.edu 
>   Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 4:09 AM
>   Subject: Re: [plt-scheme] Please help test version 359.100
> 
> 
>   My reading indicates they would both be legal.
> 
>   What seems to be illegal is
> 
>     (for-each (lambda (x) (values x x)) (list 1))
>     -->
>     (values 1 1)
>
> If I understand well, the procedure is invoked in tail position when
> reaching the last element of the list. To me it seems up to the
> continuation of the for-each call how many values can be returned. (I
> don't bother much about this for in my code for-each calls always (I
> hope) have continuations that disregard any returned value(s))

That's what for-each does (did, until very recently anyways). The
question is whether or not that's legal.

Robby