From: Matthew Flatt (mflatt at cs.utah.edu) Date: Mon May 29 12:42:28 EDT 2006 |
|
At Mon, 29 May 2006 08:16:50 -0700 (PDT), Danny Yoo wrote: > I get the feeling that this has something to do > with the "hopelessness" of the toplevel. Yes. > 'a' should have > treated a as an unbound. There's no distinction between a reference to the top-level variable `a' and a reference to an unbound `a'. Matthew
Posted on the users mailing list. |
|