[plt-scheme] A Comment on MzScheme Performance vis-a-vis WebApplications

From: Chongkai Zhu (u0476504 at utah.edu)
Date: Thu Jun 8 05:36:33 EDT 2006

That still doesn't make sence. Even if this is true, Matthew will change mzc 
to produce the same compiled code as the JIT compiler. So I take it to 
mean v301 is much faster then v299 or v209.

Chongkai

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Noel Welsh" <noelwelsh at yahoo.com>
To: <pocm at sat.inesc-id.pt>; "pltscheme" <plt-scheme at list.cs.brown.edu>
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 2:16 AM
Subject: Re: [plt-scheme] A Comment on MzScheme Performance vis-a-vis WebApplications


> --- "Paulo J. Matos" <pocmatos at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> This last sentence is brain-damaging me. So, you mean
>> that code
>> compiled with mzc is slower than if you run it in
>> mzscheme
>> (interpreted)? Or mzscheme is already compiling code
>> also?
> 
> It take it to mean the just in time (JIT) compiler recently
> introduced in MzScheme (after 301 IIRC) produces faster
> code than that produced by mzc.
> 
> N.
> 
> Email: noelwelsh <at> yahoo <dot> com   noel <at> untyped <dot> com
> AIM: noelhwelsh
> Blogs: http://monospaced.blogspot.com/  http://www.untyped.com/untyping/
> 

Posted on the users mailing list.