[plt-scheme] keywords, take 2 (a backward-compatible change)

--- Matthew Flatt <mflatt at cs.utah.edu> wrote:


> For those who like the idea of keywords: are `#:'
> keywords good enough,
> or is the `#:' syntax so intrusive/ugly that the
> experiment is useless or misleading?

All of O'Caml is ugly and that doesn't stop people using it
;=) #: seems a reasonable compromise for now.

N.

Email: noelwelsh <at> yahoo <dot> com   noel <at> untyped <dot> com
AIM: noelhwelsh
Blogs: http://monospaced.blogspot.com/  http://www.untyped.com/untyping/


		
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
http://mail.yahoo.com