[plt-scheme] pattern matching and syntaxes

From: Corey Sweeney (corey.sweeney at gmail.com)
Date: Sun May 22 12:03:01 EDT 2005

I'm considering writing a functional pattern matcher (as opposed to
one implemented as a macro).   If I implement it, I might as well make
it as as syntactically similar to one of the existing matchers, and I
was wondering if anyone had reasons for/against going with a
"define-syntax" like syntax over a "match" like syntax.


Posted on the users mailing list.