[plt-scheme] dynamic require

On Jun  7, Hans Oesterholt-Dijkema wrote:
> Eli Barzilay schreef:
> 
> >Well -- if you want to have your XML configuration path be platform
> >independent, then still I think that a specification with forward
> >slashes, and relative to a known anchor point, is better.
> >
> Hmm, What about a URI library module?

URIs contain more information than module paths.  (I think there was
some talk about making a module name resolver that starts with a
"method://" thing, but I'm not sure.)

-- 
          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
                  http://www.barzilay.org/                 Maze is Life!