[plt-scheme] test case boxes in drscheme (trying to abstrat over them)

Actually, you can't use PLaneT to get a version-299 SchemeUnit because 
(a) the new 299-enabled PLaneT isn't in the exp-tag yet (sometime 
between today and Friday that'll change, promise), and (b) to my 
knowledge there's no v299 SchemeUnit to go in it anyway.

-jacob


Matthias Felleisen wrote:

>  For list-related administrative tasks:
>  http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme
>
> Use planet.
>
> Thanks Noel -- and see 
> http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/matthias/670-s05/Lectures/5.html
>
> -- Matthias :-)
> On Feb 2, 2005, at 1:02 PM, Corey Sweeney wrote:
>
>>   For list-related administrative tasks:
>>   http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme
>>
>> I had not tried it.  I downloaded 2.0 from sourceforge, and it does
>> not install under 299v99.  In particular i get:
>> setup-plt: Compiling .zos used by schemeunit
>> setup-plt:   in /home/corey/.plt-scheme/299.29/collects/schemeunit/
>> assert-base.ss:65:19: compile: unbound variable in module in:
>> make-exn:application:type
>>
>> I must use the new version as my application makes heavy use of unicode.
>> is there a version of schemeunit compatible with 299.29?
>>
>> Corey
>>
>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 09:08:09 -0800 (PST), Noel Welsh 
>> <noelwelsh at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> --- Corey Sweeney <corey.sweeney at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>   For list-related administrative tasks:
>>>>   http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme
>>>>
>>>> Hi.  I've lately been having a lot of fun with the test
>>>> case boxes
>>>> that can be inserted with drscheme.  I've found them
>>>> pretty cool, as
>>>> my code used to spew out screen after screen of test
>>>> cases as i'd develop it.
>>>
>>>
>>> Out of interest, have you considered SchemeUnit?  If so,
>>> what features does it lack?
>>>
>>> Ta,
>>> Noel
>>>
>>> =====
>>> Email: noelwelsh <at> yahoo <dot> com
>>> AIM: noelhwelsh
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________
>>> Do You Yahoo!?
>>> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
>>>
>>
>
>