[plt-scheme] to define, or to let

From: Bradd W. Szonye (bradd+plt at szonye.com)
Date: Sun Mar 21 20:45:24 EST 2004

Paul Schlie wrote:
> The corollary would then be, in order to detect programmer errors
> enabled by an inherently error prone ambiguously evaluated function,
> let, let*, and let-rec constructs ....

How are non-sequential constructs "inherently error prone"? They aren't
even ambiguous. The order of evaluation isn't specified, but that's the
whole point of using such a construct!

By the way, please do not Cc: me when you reply. I already get a
perfectly good copy of the e-mail from the list software.
Bradd W. Szonye

Posted on the users mailing list.