[plt-scheme] to define, or to let

Paul Schlie wrote:
> The corollary would then be, in order to detect programmer errors
> enabled by an inherently error prone ambiguously evaluated function,
> let, let*, and let-rec constructs ....

How are non-sequential constructs "inherently error prone"? They aren't
even ambiguous. The order of evaluation isn't specified, but that's the
whole point of using such a construct!

By the way, please do not Cc: me when you reply. I already get a
perfectly good copy of the e-mail from the list software.
-- 
Bradd W. Szonye
http://www.szonye.com/bradd