[plt-scheme] to define, or to let

On Mar 20, Bradd W. Szonye wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 12:21:45PM -0500, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> > On Mar 20, Richard C. Cobbe wrote:
> > > [...]  (It's entirely possible that MzScheme does define the
> > > results in this case; I don't remember, and I'm in the middle of
> > > rebuilding DrScheme so I can't check the helpdesk.)
> > 
> > It does allow E2 to depend on a's value.
> 
> Sort of, although it's somewhat dangerous (and non-portable) to assume
> that the Scheme interpreter will do it that way.

By "It" I meant MzScheme.

-- 
          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
                  http://www.barzilay.org/                 Maze is Life!