[plt-scheme] hey ! where's send super

What I wrote is for methods. I don't believe you can re-export a 
different field than your superclass.

Robby

On Mar 3, 2004, at 5:01 AM, ifconfig wrote:

> Don't you need to inherit and rename the field as in (inherit (rename
> [super-write write])) or something like that?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: plt-scheme-admin at list.cs.brown.edu
> [mailto:plt-scheme-admin at list.cs.brown.edu] On Behalf Of Robby Findler
> Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 6:25 AM
> To: briand at aracnet.com
> Cc: plt-scheme at list.cs.brown.edu
> Subject: Re: [plt-scheme] hey ! where's send super
>
>   For list-related administrative tasks:
>   http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme
>
> Use `rename' to get access to the super.
>
>   (rename [super-write write])
>   (define/override (write)
>     (printf "my writing\n")
>     (super-write))
>
> Robby
>
> At Tue, 2 Mar 2004 20:18:35 -0800, briand at aracnet.com wrote:
>>   For list-related administrative tasks:
>>   http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme
>>
>>
>> I just _know_ that I'm not interpreting the use of class.ss correctly.
>> Probably the answer is something to do with interfaces, I'm sure :-)
>>
>> Class A inherits class B
>>
>> class A has a write routine which writes out thing specific to A (not
>> inherited from B).
>>
>> it then does send-super to write out those things which are specific
>> to class B
>>
>> Only it doesn't do that because:
>>
>> 1.  I can't redefine the write routine without overriding it and I'm
>> certainly not going to re-write the write routine to handle A & B
>> because completely defeats the purpose.
>>
>> 2.  there's no send-super even if I could do this.
>>
>> and the write(hehe) way to do this is ?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Brian
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
-------
SII(SII)
&
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))