[plt-scheme] Re: Visual Studio .NET ...easier than PLT Scheme

Jacob Matthews <jacobm at cs.uchicago.edu> writes:

> Joe Marshall wrote:
>
>> Isn't the point of higher-level languages to abstract out `boilerplate'?
>
> I think even a wizard that asks the user 10 questions and then just
> spits out
>
> (wizard-result-fn ANS_1 ... ANS_10)
>
> as its generated code would be useful.
>
> So I don't think the 'wizards = boilerplate' equation is quite correct.

That's certainly a much better mechanism than the standard `visual
studio' way.