[plt-scheme] New nightly-build installers
I installed the nightly build on MacOS X using the new installer. Since
there isn't an installation README yet I had to guess what to do, so
maybe I got that wrong -- here's what I did:
1. downloaded the Full-PLT dmg
2. ran the "Frameworks" pkg installation
3. copied the Full PLT folder into /Applications
4. double-clicked "Finish Install"
So maybe I missed a step, but now when I try and run setup-plt on a
.plt file, I get the following error:
cannot install; version (200) of collection ("mzscheme") is
required, but version <unknown> is installed
Dave
On Sunday, January 4, 2004, at 09:18 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> For list-related administrative tasks:
> http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme
>
> The nightly builds page contains now various installers for different
> platforms. This means that using the recent CVS version is just as
> easy as using "official" distributions. The relevant page is:
>
> http://download.plt-scheme.org/scheme/installers
>
> See the bottom of that page for instructions.
>
> Please send any feedback regarding anything at all (I prefer emails to
> go directly to me since it's still in an early stage) -- from
> information on the web page, to installer instruction texts. I expect
> a lot of rough edges that need smoothing.
>
> Two specific thing where I will appreciate any help I can get are:
>
> 1. For the OSX dmg files, I couldn't find any way of setting the
> folder attributes to display the instructions background, and to
> set the icon positions. I've spent a lot of google time but came
> up with nothing so far, so if anyone knows how to do this, I would
> very much like to hear about it.
>
> 2. The Windows installers were not tested too widely so far, I would
> like to hear if there are any problems (there might by some
> registry problems, and in addition I didn't try this on a non-NT
> Windows.)
>
> Additional notes:
>
> 1. This will be the same mechanism that will be used for future
> releases, which is why it would be nice to get some feedback.
>
> 2. Download sizes are bigger now, because they contain the .zo files.
> (The extra download time should be much smaller than the time for
> generating the .zo files, even with a dialup connection...)
>
> 3. The `full' install type is no something that is officially
> distributed -- it is the whole exp-tagged cvs tree, fully compiled,
> including all documentations and the complete source tree. This is
> why it's such a huge download compared to the others.
>
> 4. The consistent smaller size of Windows installers is not an optical
> illusion -- I'm now using the NSIS installer (from the WinAmp
> project) which has a new compression mode that is very efficient.
>
> 5. The sh installers for the different unix platforms are a shell
> wrapper around a tgz file that will check itself, unpack, run the
> installer to create executables, and create links if you ask it
> to. For Linux, I will do something similar with an RPM file (which
> means that there will be no src rpm), so the size should reduce
> with the bzip2 compression.
>
> --
> ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli
> Barzilay:
> http://www.barzilay.org/ Maze is
> Life!