From: Matthew Flatt (mflatt at cs.utah.edu) Date: Wed Aug 25 17:02:19 EDT 2004 |
|
At Wed, 11 Aug 2004 00:47:29 -0400, Psy-Kosh wrote: > Not using it at this time, but, dumb thought, however why couldn't it > instead be set up to work like fluid-let? I went from this suggestion to the thought that parameters work better than `fluid-let', so we probably want something like parameters for syntax. Hence the "stxparam.ss" library in v299.14. Thanks! Matthew
Posted on the users mailing list. |
|