From: Eli Barzilay (eli at barzilay.org) Date: Tue Sep 9 14:54:11 EDT 2003 |
|
On Sep 9, Robby Findler wrote: > Whatever you do, don't use sempahores! Is there any reason (beyond the slightly lower-level interface) for semaphores have the same status as radioactive waste now? > Use waitables and the operations on them. Semaphores are waitables, no? -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://www.barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
Posted on the users mailing list. |
|