| From: Eli Barzilay (eli at barzilay.org) Date: Tue Sep 9 14:54:11 EDT 2003 |
|
On Sep 9, Robby Findler wrote:
> Whatever you do, don't use sempahores!
Is there any reason (beyond the slightly lower-level interface)
for semaphores have the same status as radioactive waste now?
> Use waitables and the operations on them.
Semaphores are waitables, no?
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://www.barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
| Posted on the users mailing list. |
|