From: Joe Marshall (jrm at ccs.neu.edu) Date: Thu May 29 16:23:24 EDT 2003 |
|
----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthew Flatt" <mflatt at cs.utah.edu> > > The bottom line is that `eq-hash-code' isn't always the right thing, > just as `eq?' isn't always the right thing. But `eq?' is sometimes > sufficient, and so is `eq-hash-code'. > It seems bizarre that EQ?, which is the right thing for (interned) symbols doesn't play well with EQ-HASH-CODE when you use them together on interned symbols.
Posted on the users mailing list. |
|