[plt-scheme] Re: plt-scheme digest, Vol 1 #366 - 4 msgs

So (require (assemble "System")) would create a (module system .....) 
and (require system) ?

Katsmall T. Wise

Pedro Pinto wrote:

>  For list-related administrative tasks:
>  http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme
>
>Yes, it should and is in the real example. I mistyped. I probably was not
>very clear though: the error message I get refers to the artificial module
>created by the extension not the real test.ss.
>
>Thanks,
>-pp
>
>
>  
>
>>Message: 4
>>Date: Tue, 06 May 2003 11:46:57 +0200
>>From: Katsmall the Wise <kela_bit at netvision.net.il>
>>Subject: Re: [plt-scheme] abusing modules
>>To: Pedro Pinto <ppinto at cs.cmu.edu>
>>Cc: plt-scheme at list.cs.brown.edu
>>
>>Shouldn't the file name be either test.ss or test.scm?
>>Not sure about it, though.
>>
>>When you (require (assembly name)), can name be "System",
>>"System.Reflection", "Microsoft.DirectX" and the suchlikes?
>>
>>Katsmall T. Wise
>>
>>Pedro Pinto wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>This works if `test' is define and required at the top level. However
>>>`(require "test")' results in an error:
>>>
>>>require: unknown module: <module-name>
>>>
>>>Any ideas as to why? I realize that this is a bit of an abuse of the
>>>module system but I am somewhat infatuated with the cleanness of the
>>>syntax.
>>>
>>>Thanks in advance,
>>>-pp
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>
>>
>>End of plt-scheme Digest
>>    
>>
>
>
>  
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20030506/531423e7/attachment.html>